fumbledeegrumble:

goldstar-punk:

for-southendgirls:

criticalthinkingmaybe:

baconcourse:

WELP.

tbh that person just ended the entire discourse

lol @ all the mogai kweers reblogging this who think this is not at all about them when it absolutely is

#and yes i’m absolutely taking about cishet aces#and crusty kinksters#and y’alls ‘kin’ bullshit

oh man do i have some bad news for you guys

one thing I’ve noticed: “cishet” has always meant cis + heterosexual. always. yet for some reason when the TERFs jumped ship and started trying to alienate a-specs, it suddenly means cis + heteroMANTIC. (because they slowly learned asexuality is an orientation, so you can’t be asexual AND heterosexual…)

this isn’t a coincidence. they’re trying to bend rules and split hairs over semantics bc they know they have no real ground the stand on, that’s always been their game. but by simply being asexual or aromantic, you’re not conforming to heteronormative standards, thus you experience oppression and discrimination. (different kinds, but a lesbian will experience different struggles compared to a pansexual. some aspects are worse, some are better, but they’re all in the same ballpark for the same reason–THAT’S what the queer community has always found common ground on)

a-specs are an orientation. kinksters, furries, kin, p*dos, anything ends in -philia/-philiac etc are not. the queer community is about supporting each other regarding harmless minority orientations and gender identities.

if you’re in any of the a-spec umbrella, you’re queer, you’re in the LGBTQIA+ community, you’re valid, you belong.

transmanrichardstrand:

bruddabois:

yellowjuice:

eelpatrickharris:

bdotlgdot:

fall-and-shadows:

pronounrespecter:

swearwolvez:

youre-a-fucking-human-being:

ua86:

hardboiledoldman:

travelling-cat-salesman:

pon-raul:

psyducked:

please raise your children to wash their hands after they use the restroom I’ve watched too many men walk straight out of the bathroom from the stall without a second thought and it’s keeping me up at night

I mean if you taking a piss who cares if you don’t wash your hands, unless you just like go full power and spray yourself like a out of control fire hose

stay the fuck away from me

people who wash their hands after peeing are weak and must be culled

The only excuse for not washing your hands after you piss is mastering the art of pissing without touching your genitals.

You wash your hands every time you touch your dick? How grimy is your dick?

I’m literally never shaking a man’s hand ever again in my life y’all need jesus

remember how i told y’all?

(they don’t wash their hands after shitting either)

What I’m learning is that men are the reason for “employees must wash their hands” signs and why I never put 2 and 2 together is beyond me

Just out of curiosity, do yall wash your hands every time you touch your arm or the back of your hand or any other part if your body?

wash your fucking hands, dickfingers mcgee

what the fuck is wrong with these dudes bruh

I want to spray this post with Lysol

AHEM.

“According to epidemiologist Richard T. Ellison III, it doesn’t matter what you do in the bathroom when it comes to keeping your hands clean. ‘The rationale is that when toileting, it’s possible to have fecal material and fecal bacteria get onto your hands … So it’s wisest to always wash with soap and water even after urinating. Neither plain water nor alcohol hand sanitizers are effective at removing fecal material or killing bacteria in fecal material.’ 

“According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, handwashing can prevent various illnesses and infections. Ellison added that it can also keep us from coming in contact with E. Coli and hepatitis.This is especially important for men to bear in mind because of perianal sweat. This type of sweat forms around the perianal area, which is the patch of skin outside the rectum. It can then spread to one’s underwear and to other parts of the body like the penis. Biology professor Pat Fidopiastis explained, ‘The point is that simply touching the penis in an effort to direct your urine flow can be more than enough to transfer harmful microbes to your hands, and then on to the pretzels sitting in bowl on the bar.’“

WASH.

YOUR.

HANDS.

Fandom as a whole is not “minor-friendly”

littlesystems:

harriet-spy:

Nor should it be.

If you want to live in a “Children of the Corn”-style bubble of innocence and purity, well, to me, that’s a startling approach to adolescence, but every generation’s got to find its own way to reject the one before, so: do as you will.  But you can’t bring the bubble to the party, kids.  Fandom, established media-style fandom, was by and for adults before some of your parents were born now.  You don’t get to show up and demand that everyone suddenly change their ways because you’re a minor and you want to enjoy the benefits of adult creative activity without the bits that make you uncomfortable.  If you think you’re old enough to be roaming the Internet unsupervised, then you also think you’re old enough to be working out your limits by experience, like everybody else, like I did when I was underage and lying about it online.  If you’re not old enough to be roaming the Internet unsupervised and you’re doing it anyway, then that’s on your parents, not on fandom.

If you were only reading fic rated G on AO3, if you had the various safe modes on other media enabled, you would be encountering very little disturbing material, anyway (at least in the crude way people tend to define “disturbing” these days; some of the most frankly horrifying art I have ever engaged with would have been rated PG at most under present systems, but none of that kind of work ever seems to draw your protests).  In the end, what you really want is to be able to seek out the edges of your little world, but be able to blame other people when you don’t like what you find.  Sorry.  Adolescence is when you get to stop expecting others to pad your world for you and start experiencing the actual consequences of the risks you take, including feeling appalled and revolted at what other people think and feel.

Now, ironically, fandom’s actually a fairly good place for such risk-taking, as, for the most part, you control whether you engage and you can choose the level of your engagement.   You can leave a site, blacklist something, stop reading an author, walk away from your computer.  Are there actual people (as opposed to works of art, which cannot engage with you unless you engage with them) who will take advantage of you in fandom?  Of course there are.  Unfortunately, such people are everywhere.  They will be there however “innocent” and “wholesome” the environment appears to be, superficially.  That’s evil for you.  There are abusers in elementary school.  There are abusers in scout troops.  There are abusers in houses of worship.  Shutting down adult creative activity because you happen to be in the vicinity isn’t going to change any of that.  It may help you avoid some of those icky feelings that you get when you think about sex (and you live in a rape culture, those feelings are actually understandable, even if your coping techniques are terrible), but no one, except maybe your parents, has a moral imperative to help you avoid those.  

In the end, you’re not my kid and you’re not my intended audience.  I’m under no obligation to imagine only healthy, wholesome relationships between people for your benefit.  Until you’re old enough to understand that the world is not exclusively made up of people whose responsibility it is to protect you from your own decisions, yes, you’re too young for established media fandom.  Fandom shouldn’t be “friendly” to you.  

So this whole minors-in-fandom seems to be the big hot button topic right now, and this post pretty much sums up everything I have to say about the issue. But after reading this post, I had an epiphany while cooking dinner. While I usually don’t jump into The Discourse myself, I needed to share my discovery. So a few years ago I read this excellent article “The Overprotected Kid” – if you haven’t read it, go do it. Now. Seriously. It’s ostensibly about “millennials” but it’s talking mostly about kids that were 5-15 at the time the article was written, i.e. kids who are 8-18ish now. So, basically, this entire white-knight age group of kid crusaders.

Basically, all of this boils down to a generational divide on how we were raised. Like, I could have told you that, but. Really. Basically every line in this article is solid gold, and completely explains the phenomenon we’re embroiled in right now. The article specifically talks about how playing in “dangerous” playgrounds helps children mature and learn how to safely take risks. Well, fandom has long been called a sandbox for a reason, and the parallels are so close it’s bizarre.

Like, navigating your way through fandom spaces that have explicit content or disturbing themes?

“The idea was that kids should face what to them seem like “really dangerous risks” and then conquer them alone. That, she said, is what builds self-confidence and courage.”

Or

“At the core of the safety obsession is a view of children that is the exact opposite of Lady Allen’s, “an idea that children are too fragile or unintelligent to assess the risk of any given situation,” argues Tim Gill, the author of No Fear, a critique of our risk-averse society. “Now our working assumption is that children cannot be trusted to find their way around tricky physical or social and emotional situations.”

Or

Even today, growing up is a process of managing fears and learning to arrive at sound decisions. By engaging in risky play, children are effectively subjecting themselves to a form of exposure therapy, in which they force themselves to do the thing they’re afraid of in order to overcome their fear. But if they never go through that process, the fear can turn into a phobia.

Basically, the problem is this: the 14 and 15 and 16 year-olds on this sight have been, largely, helicopter-parented for every moment of every day of their lives. Many of them have never had to take care of themselves, or navigate difficult emotional situations without parental guidance. When I was a kid, the internet was the wild west, and parents universally told us that everyone on the internet was a pedophile who wanted to kill you, so you had to keep yourself safe. Now, kids always expect there to be a parent there to take care of their emotional needs, and when they go onto online spaces, the just assume that the nearest adult will fill in that role for them, whether that adult is interested or not.

Now, kids are out here saying shit like “i dont know how you dont know that as an adult its your responsibility to maintain a safe environment for children, just as much as it is their parents. for ex not swearing around kids or letting teenagers drink alcohol like every adult knows that.. “

I am not your mother. It’s not my responsibility to ensure that there isn’t underaged drinking. If I walk past a couple of teenagers drinking beers on the street, do you know what I’m going to do about it? Nothing. Absolutely nothing, because I don’t care and I’m not their mother, and I’m not your mother either. I’ll watch my mouth if I notice that there’s a kid near me, but that doesn’t mean I don’t swear in public, even if there could be kids around me that I haven’t noticed.

This expectation, that every adult is there to monitor you and watch out for you, and if they aren’t willing to do that then they’re a bad person?

“in all my years as a parent, I’ve mostly met children who take it for granted that they are always being watched.”

Or how about this chilling factoid?

“When my daughter was about 10, my husband suddenly realized that in her whole life, she had probably not spent more than 10 minutes unsupervised by an adult. Not 10 minutes in 10 years.”

These are the kids on here shouting “I need an adult!” and then getting offended when no adult rushes in to take care. It’s baffling to me, honestly, but. I didn’t grow up this way. My parents taught me how to make good decisions, take care of myself, and navigate difficult situations, both in the “real” world AND online. I… don’t really know what to say to kids whose parents didn’t.

I’m not your mom. If I want kids, I’ll have my own. And I won’t raise them the way your parents raised you.

exactly this. fandom itself doesn’t need to be minor-friendly, but just like the real world, there should be minor-friendly spaces that should still come with an accompanying parent.

websites are just like playgrounds. if your kid isn’t old enough to safely look after themselves, watch them. you don’t need to every waking moment; but just like you glance at the jungle gym to make sure Molly isn’t climbing too high, you need to glance at the websites they go to, who they interact with. don’t be invasive, bc you’re not secretly spying on your kid at the playgrounds from the bushes with binoculars. be open and honest, engage with them. be involved with their interests and activities. you’ll sniff out the truly dangerous stuff easily.

this whole “you’re a shitty adult if you don’t look out for kids” is ridiculous. everyone will look out for a kid if they see something terrible. a kid running into the street? an adult will likely catch them to help, bc the repercussions are too heavy to be a learning lesson. someone sees a minor talking to someone online who’s obviously trying to groom them? same deal.

but stumbling across a nsfw fanfic is more like tripping through a yard they’ve been told not to go into without an adult. it’ll hurt, but it’s not permanent, and now they now not to run into the yard that’s got a bunch of hidden sprinklers in the grass. or being told to wear knee pads, and getting a scraped knee when they forego them.

their parents need to give them guidelines, and make sure their kids know how to use those guidelines. if the kid ignores said guidelines and gets hurt, surrounding adults will help if it’s serious. but no one is EXPECTED to hover, especially in mild situations.

we have a whole generation who grew up with a few rules, who broke them from time to time, learned from it, and didn’t have their lives irreversibly alerted due to seeing moderate adult content online. warning tags, 18+ confirmation entry, blacklists, safe modes, etc. are all fences, knee pads, caution signs, and advising words from adults. kids need to follow these guidelines, and if they don’t, learn from it.

when we say you can’t bubble wrap the world, it doesn’t mean we dont care about kids, or that we won’t help someone truly in need. it means that most of the world is an adult world, and kids need to learn to traverse it with safely with parental guidance, but they still need to traverse it. you can’t lock a kid inside your house until they’re 18. take them outside, there are an abundance of tools at your disposal to aid in safe learning.

Oh shoot I think the part of my ask got cut off cause it was too long haha.

I couldn’t find the summary and bios cause I’m n my phone, lol.

My question was how do demons aquire a flock? Are dreams/nightmares limited to demons that deal with those types of things or can any sufficiently powerful demon have one? How and why would a nightmare come into service (is that the right word?) To a young demon growing in power? Is it of their own volition or are they kind of snagged by the demon’s power as they go by?


Nightmares are simply attracted to (though not snagged by) demons’ power in the Mindscape. A Nightmare out on its own is basically a wandering potential snack for anything that might happen by, and this may very well include other Nightmares. It is formless and relatively weak.

But once a Nightmare has attached itself to a demon, it gains a stable form (the exact shape of which is dependent upon the demon itself) and thereby usually some better means of self-defense, as well as a relatively safe place to stay and a little more power, as attached Nightmares get to feed off of a demon’s surplus. In exchange, the Nightmares act as servants, sycophants, and, in extremis, occasional snacks for the demon.

It’s only relatively safe, not completely.

They enter this service of their own volition. Technically a Nightmare could choose to remain independent. These don’t tend to last as long as the ones who have joined a demon’s ranks, even with the snacking thing taken into account.

Each demon can also only support/keep so many Nightmares, as determined by their power. There’s basically a capacity limit in each little bubbled realm of dreamspace. Nightmares can typically sense whether there’s room for them or not. There’s not generally much of an application process. Typically they just slide in and assimilate, and most demons don’t really care about them as individuals.

So to Nightmares, a new young demon in the mindscape without a following…

…more or less.

As for Dreams, overall they’re the ultimate prey in this environment and don’t attach to demons as a general rule, mostly because they’d be eaten immediately, either by said demon or by the Nightmares under said demon’s command.

Alcor’s pretty much a weirdo all around in this aspect, as he is in so many others.